Community Health Administration Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
home search contact us

EDCP Mission/Vision

Bioterrorism
Fact Sheets
Guidelines
Case Report Forms
Immunization
Influenza
Outbreak Investigation
Public Health Application for Student Experience (PHASE)
Reportable Diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Tuberculosis Control
Veterinary Public Health
West Nile Virus
Emerging Infections Program
ImmuNet

Is Emergency Departments (ED) Syndromic Surveillance Useful for Monitoring General Illness Trends?

L EDWARDS, A WILDER, A BERGMANN, J SCALETTA,
J CASANI, D BLYTHE
Office of Epidemiology and Disease Control Programs, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene


Background: ED syndromic surveillance systems that classify ED clinical data into syndrome categories may help identify unannounced bioterrorist attacks. They may also provide insight into overall disease patterns in the community, although this has not been clearly demonstrated previously.

Methods: Beginning September 12, 2001, ED logs from nine Maryland hospitals were coded daily into eight illness categories – death, sepsis, rash illness, respiratory illness, gastroenteritis, unspecified infection-like illness (UI), neurological illness, and all other visits. The average weekly proportion of ED visits coded as respiratory was compared to the weekly number of respiratory outbreaks reported to the state health department. Kappa statistics were calculated correlating weeks when the average proportion of respiratory ED visits increased by > 10% to weeks when reported respiratory outbreaks increased by two or more.

Results: The percentage ED visits coded as respiratory illnesses ranged from 11.0% - 16.6%, and peaked during the week of January 13, 2002. The number of respiratory outbreaks reported each week ranged from 0 – 9, peaking during the week of January 20. When a 10% or greater increase in average respiratory ED visits was compared to increases in respiratory outbreaks reported during the same week, there was poor agreement (Kappa = - 0.17); however, comparing increases in respiratory ED visits to outbreaks reported two weeks later showed good agreement (Kappa = 0.61). One 10% increase in respiratory ED visits was followed one week, instead of two weeks, later by an increase in respiratory outbreaks. Reclassifying these as a concordant pair in the analysis yielded excellent agreement (Kappa = 0.76).

Conclusions: Information collected in Maryland suggests that syndromic surveillance captures trends in respiratory illnesses approximately two weeks earlier than reports of outbreaks. This analysis indicates that in addition to serving as a system for detecting bioterrorist events, syndromic surveillance activities may be able to yield general illness trend information and may help predict upcoming respiratory illnesses in the community.


Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene — Epidemiology & Disease Control Program

back Back|top Top | Print Version
Links marked with This is a .pdf file and requires Acrobat Reader are PDF. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader for viewing .pdf files
Search our Site

View this page in


Community Health Administration

Home | Site Map | Factsheet Index
Reports & Statistics | Local Health Departments | Contact

Site Use Policies

To address technical problems or make suggestions regarding this site please contact us.

TTY Number: 1-800-735-2258 | General Information (410) 767-6742

Community Health Administration
Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

COPYRIGHT © 1999-2002 Community Health Administration and it's licensors. All Rights Reserved
External Links Disclaimer

Last Modified {ts '2006-07-12 08:07:46'}